
Free Daily Podcast Summary
by Oyez
A case in which the Court held that criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA) is penal for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause.
The most recent episodes — sign up to get AI-powered summaries of each one.
A case in which the Court will decide whether the phrase “goods or services from a video tape service provider,” as used in the Video Privacy Protection Act’s definition of “consumer,” refers to all of a video tape service provider’s goods or services or only to its audiovisual goods or services.
A case in which the Court will decide whether Stinson v. United States still correctly states the rule for deference that courts must give the Commentary of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
A case in which the Court will decide whether Stinson v. United States still correctly states the rule for deference that courts must give the Commentary of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
A case in which the Court will decide (1) when the federal government submits a permit application to continue disposing of hazardous waste, whether that submission count as a final, reviewable government decision under federal law; and (2) before submitting that permit application, whether the federal government must first conduct the broad environmental review that federal law generally requires—even though the hazardous waste permitting process already includes its own, more limited environmental review.
A case in which the Court will decide whether a complaint alleging a fiduciary breach in ERISA underperformance cases must include allegations of a “meaningful benchmark” to survive the pleading stage.
A case in which the Court will decide whether the Veterans’ Judicial Review Act stripped district courts of the jurisdiction, recognized by this court in Johnson v. Robison, to hear challenges to the constitutionality of acts of Congress affecting veterans’ benefits.
A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether it has statutory and Article III jurisdiction to hear this case; and (2) whether federal law precludes state-law claims seeking relief for injuries allegedly caused by the effects of interstate and international greenhouse-gas emissions on the global climate.
A case in which the Court will decide (1) when a generic drug manufacturer excludes a patented use from its label, whether it still be liable for inducing infringement if it calls its product a “generic version” of the brand-name drug and cites publicly available information about the brand-name drug's sales; and (2) whether a patent infringement complaint can survive dismissal if it does not allege that the defendant made any statement specifically instructing or encouraging the patented use.
Free AI-powered daily recaps. Key takeaways, quotes, and mentions — in a 5-minute read.
Get Free Summaries →Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Listeners also like.

Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Audio recordings of oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court, with detailed case summaries and navigable transcripts.

Audio Arguendo
Raw recordings of Supreme Court oral arguments and notable global cases, presented for public access.

The High Court Report
Clear, jargon-free analysis of Supreme Court decisions and oral arguments, explained by an experienced attorney.

Supreme Court Brief
A weekly breakdown of U.S. Supreme Court cases and their impact on law, business, and policy, featuring expert analysis and interviews.
Bound By Oath by IJ
Explores the U.S. Constitution’s text and history through judicial oaths, legal scholarship, and landmark cases.

5-4
A progressive critique of the U.S. Supreme Court and the political forces behind its landmark decisions.

Advisory Opinions
Legal analysis and court discussions with insights into how law intersects with politics.

Is This Really Legal?
A legal expert breaks down current events and constitutional issues to clarify what’s actually allowed under U.S. law.

Civil Procedure
A podcast about Civil Procedure for law students and others interested in the subject.

Let The Record Show
Explores the history and impact of major U.S. court cases that shape modern life.

UNBIASED Politics
A former attorney provides impartial summaries of U.S. political news, elections, and legal developments with clear explanations of constitutional issues.

In Session: Leading the Judiciary
Conversations with experts on leadership and management issues relevant to federal judiciary executives.
A case in which the Court held that criminal restitution under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA) is penal for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause.
AI-powered recaps with compact key takeaways, quotes, and insights.
Get key takeaways from U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments in a 5-minute read.
Stay current on your favorite podcasts without falling behind.
It's a free AI-powered email that summarizes new episodes of U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments as soon as they're published. You get the key takeaways, notable quotes, and links & mentions — all in a quick read.
When a new episode drops, our AI transcribes and analyzes it, then generates a personalized summary tailored to your interests and profession. It's delivered to your inbox every morning.
No. Podzilla is an independent service that summarizes publicly available podcast content. We're not affiliated with or endorsed by Oyez.
Absolutely! The free plan covers up to 3 podcasts, any in the catalog. Basic raises that to 15, Pro to 40 and Max to 100. Browse our full catalog at /podcasts.
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments publishes daily. Our AI generates a summary within hours of each new episode.
U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments covers topics including Government. Our AI identifies the specific themes in each episode and highlights what matters most to you.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.