Free Daily Podcast Summary
Bound By Oath by IJ: Daily Summaries Delivered
by Institute for Justice
Bound by Oath is a podcast series from the Center for Judicial Engagement at the Institute for Justice. It’s where the Constitution’s past catches up with the present. Article VI of the U.S. Constitution requires every judge to be “bound by Oath” to uphold “this Constitution.” But to understand if judges are following that oath, it’s important to ask, “What is in ‘this Constitution’?” Your host John Ross takes a deep dive into the Constitution’s text, history, and characters, and interviews historians, legal scholars, and the real people involved in historic and contemporary cases.
Latest Episodes
The most recent episodes — sign up to get AI-powered summaries of each one.
- Sep 4, 20261h 10m
Younger abstention | Season 4, Ep. 4
In 1966, Los Angeles officials tried to put a man in prison for handing out leaflets in protest of a fatal police shooting. Today, we know the case as Younger v. Harris, which kicked off the doctrine of Younger abstention, the bane of many a civil rights plaintiff. On this episode, we examine the origins, the impact, and the relentless expansion of the doctrine. Younger v. Harris Click here for transcript.
- Jun 29, 202647 min
Oath or Affirmation. (And Treason.) | Season 4, Ep. 3
On this episode, we recover a lost part of the Fourth Amendment that the Supreme Court essentially erased in 1960. In the case of Jones v. United States, the Court ignored text, history, and tradition, and disfigured the Warrant Clause, allowing law enforcement to knock down doors based on mere hearsay and with scant consequences for lying or mistakes. Jones was wrong the day it was decided, and the Court should overturn it. Click here for transcript. Jones v. United States (1960) Mendenhall v. Denver
- May 29, 2026
Needless Friction. And Treason.
On this episode: the story of Pullman abstention, the first of several abstention doctrines the Supreme Court invented to let federal judges decline to decide cases that they have jurisdiction to decide. Click here for transcript. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Pullman Co.
- Apr 15, 20261h 20m
Rooker and Feldman and Treason | Season 4, Ep. 1
Next week, the Supreme Court is going to hear a huge civil rights case that no one is talking about—because the legal issue before the Court is the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, an obscure and slightly treasonous doctrine that lets federal judges throw worthy cases out of court without reaching the merits. On this episode, we examine the doctrine's impact as well as its origins, including the life and times of the litigants for whom it is named, William Rooker and Marc Feldman. Rooker was a big shot Indiana lawyer who represented lynching victims and Klansmen. And Marc Feldman was a professor of law who fought for the little guy. Click here for transcript. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman
- Apr 15, 20261h 20m
Rooker and Feldman and Treason | Season 4, Ep. 1 Updated
Next week, the Supreme Court is going to hear a huge civil rights case that no one is talking about—because the legal issue before the Court is the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, an obscure and slightly treasonous doctrine that lets federal judges throw worthy cases out of court without reaching the merits. On this episode, we examine the doctrine's impact as well as its origins, including the life and times of the litigants for whom it is named, William Rooker and Marc Feldman. Rooker was a big shot Indiana lawyer who represented lynching victims and Klansmen. And Marc Feldman was a professor of law who fought for the little guy. Click here for transcript. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman
- Oct 14, 20251h 11m
Indian Country | Season 3, Ep. 14
In our final episode of the season, we head to Indian Country and survey several strands of Supreme Court precedent that prevent Native Americans from putting their property to peaceful and productive use. Click here for transcript. United States v. Kagama Cobell v. Norton
- Jun 16, 20251h 12m
Neat Takings Tricks | Season 3, Ep. 13
The Fifth Amendment says that the government must pay just compensation when it takes private property for public use, a command that, regrettably, is often treated as a mere suggestion. On this episode, we take a look at a variety of gambits and flim-flammeries that let the government take property without paying for it. Click here for episode transcript. Agins v. Tiburon First English v. County of Los Angeles
- Apr 24, 202546 min
Trust But Verify | Season 3, Ep. 12
In 1973, federal narcotics agents raided a pair of homes in Collinsville, Illinois by mistake. They didn't find any drugs, but they did terrorize two innocent families. The incident sparked nationwide outrage, and in response Congress passed legislation crafting a legal remedy for victims of federal law enforcement abuses. Over the years, however, lower courts have chipped away at the law to the point where it has essentially been repealed: Last year, a federal appeals court rejected claims from an innocent family, the Martin family, who were held at gunpoint after the FBI mistakenly raided their home in Atlanta. Fortunately, next week, on April 29, 2025, the Supreme Court will hold oral argument in Martin v. United States, and IJ will urge the justices to reverse course. On this episode, we explore the Federal Tort Claims Act, which was originally enacted in 1946 and then amended in 1974, to create a remedy for wrongful acts by government officials. We feature guests who worked on getting the 1974 amendment, called the law-enforcement proviso, passed into law. Click here for episode transcript. Martin v. United States (Eleventh Circuit opinion)
Get Bound By Oath by IJ summaries in your inbox
Free AI-powered daily recaps. Key takeaways, quotes, and mentions — in a 5-minute read.
Get Free Summaries →Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
You Might Also Like
Listeners also like.
Is This Really Legal?
A legal expert breaks down current events and constitutional issues to clarify what’s actually allowed under U.S. law.
The Good Judge-ment Podcast
Two Georgia judges discuss legal issues and court practices for judicial education, with insights relevant to lawyers and the public.
American Law Cafe
Breaks down core legal concepts, landmark cases, and doctrines in clear, accessible discussions for law students and legal enthusiasts.
In Session: Leading the Judiciary
Conversations with experts on leadership and management issues relevant to federal judiciary executives.
Let The Record Show
Explores the history and impact of major U.S. court cases that shape modern life.
The Quill & Sword
Military legal experts discuss court cases, national security, leadership, and JAG Corps history in a U.S. Army podcast series.
UNBIASED Politics
A former attorney provides impartial summaries of U.S. political news, elections, and legal developments with clear explanations of constitutional issues.
Stanford Legal
Experts from Stanford Law explore constitutional law, voting rights, and landmark Supreme Court cases shaping democracy and civil rights.
The High Court Report
Clear, jargon-free analysis of Supreme Court decisions and oral arguments, explained by an experienced attorney.
5-4
A progressive critique of the U.S. Supreme Court and the political forces behind its landmark decisions.
Above the Law - Thinking Like a Lawyer
Three legal experts analyze everyday topics through a legal lens, exploring how law shapes common experiences and cultural phenomena.
Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts
A weekly exploration of the U.S. Supreme Court, its justices, and the legal issues shaping American law and society.
About Bound By Oath by IJ
Bound by Oath is a podcast series from the Center for Judicial Engagement at the Institute for Justice. It’s where the Constitution’s past catches up with the present. Article VI of the U.S. Constitution requires every judge to be “bound by Oath” to uphold “this Constitution.” But to understand if judges are following that oath, it’s important to ask, “What is in ‘this Constitution’?” Your host John Ross takes a deep dive into the Constitution’s text, history, and characters, and interviews historians, legal scholars, and the real people involved in historic and contemporary cases.
Customized Recaps
AI-powered recaps with compact key takeaways, quotes, and insights.
Straight to Your Inbox
Get key takeaways from Bound By Oath by IJ in a 5-minute read.
Save Hours Every Week
Stay current on your favorite podcasts without falling behind.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Podzilla's Bound By Oath by IJ daily summary?
It's a free AI-powered email that summarizes new episodes of Bound By Oath by IJ as soon as they're published. You get the key takeaways, notable quotes, and links & mentions — all in a quick read.
How does the Bound By Oath by IJ podcast summary work?
When a new episode drops, our AI transcribes and analyzes it, then generates a personalized summary tailored to your interests and profession. It's delivered to your inbox every morning.
Is this an official Bound By Oath by IJ product?
No. Podzilla is an independent service that summarizes publicly available podcast content. We're not affiliated with or endorsed by Institute for Justice.
Can I get summaries of other podcasts too?
Absolutely! The free plan covers up to 3 podcasts, any in the catalog. Basic raises that to 15, Pro to 40 and Max to 100. Browse our full catalog at /podcasts.
How often does Bound By Oath by IJ release new episodes?
Bound By Oath by IJ publishes monthly. Our AI generates a summary within hours of each new episode.
What topics does Bound By Oath by IJ cover?
Bound By Oath by IJ covers topics including Government. Our AI identifies the specific themes in each episode and highlights what matters most to you.
Start getting Bound By Oath by IJ summaries tomorrow morning.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.
Free forever for up to 3 podcasts. No credit card required.